megfowler.com

January 5, 2008

wee boys on skates.

Filed under: hockey — meg @ 12:37 pm

Okay, so they’re not that wee, per se, just young. Much younger than me.

But WAY better at playing hockey.

I’m sitting in my living room (in front of my fireplace, drinking coffee, waiting to make myself brunch, still in my PJs… OH YES!) watching the IIHF World Junior Hockey Championships Gold Medal Game.

Canada vs. Sweden.

Tim Horton’s vs. IKEA. Wait, I’d want IKEA to win. Never mind that.

Anyway.

Canada, at two goals up at the end of the second period, looks to be headed for their fourth Gold Medal in a row, 14th overall. Sweden? Have one Gold from 1981.

None of these kids were even alive then.

Nice.

Me? I’m looking to be headed for my fourth cup of coffee.

This? Is awesome.

UPDATE:
Tied. And into OT. BLECH.

UPDATE: FOR THE WIN, BABY! YESSSSSS! FOURTH IN A ROW!

January 1, 2008

my new year’s day.

Filed under: love, hockey, holidays — meg @ 2:14 pm

Winter Classic.

Rose Bowl.

Laptop on the coffee table, big mug of coffee, getting work done.

Homemade brownies.

Fireplace going.

Pajamas.

Amen.

December 12, 2007

how things change.

Filed under: love, hockey, Sandyeggo — meg @ 8:17 pm

Right now, our dear and beloved friend Eric (who is visiting in a week, but hasn’t updated his blog since two visits ago, and one visit to SD for us) is watching the Ducks go at the ‘Nucks in Anaheim.

That’s right. Eric — he of this entry — is at the hockey game, leaving jubilant voicemails for me about the Canucks being in the lead.

Since he’s a Canucks fan.

I think my work is complete here.

October 15, 2007

doing cronkite proud.

Filed under: random, vancouver, hockey, newsy — meg @ 4:06 am

News to the minute:

1. I’m not buying Uggs. What kind of moron, after slagging a brand of shoes for years — and refusing to wear ANY shoes herself PERIOD because they make her feet too hot — goes and spends more than $200 of her hard-earned money on footwear designed for optimal warmth?

I live in a WET city, not a cold one. I like my feet fresh and COOL, not swathed in suede-y, wooly hell. I still don’t know what I was thinking. It was like a small trend virus captured my brain. But I’m healthy now. And have no idea what type of shoes to buy for the upcoming more-wet, less-warm season. Back to square (puddle) one.

2. My sore throat from earlier has officially blossomed into a sort of burr-in-throat sensation accompanied by achy ears. I could be having an allergic reaction to something (maybe it was all that eye contact with the new laundry spider?), but if that’s the case, it should pass soon.

I DON’T HAVE TIME TO GET SICK. Just so you know. There will be no tolerance.

3. GO CANUCKS GO! With two decent wins over the Oilers in a Home-Home series this weekend, I think our boys are almost officially “back” from the Philly fiasco. We face the SJ Sharks tonight, and I think we need that victory to seal the deal and get us focused back on the big, long season ahead, and not just a blowout fluke of a contest.

Luongo is still whoa. No other way to say it. And I was pleased to see Brendan Morrison stepping up this weekend… and even a bit of fire (and a smile?!) out of Naslund! Could Vigneault have finally found his number?

And no, Darren… Trev is most certainly NOT done yet. You don’t ride out the crap he went through before the pre-season just to hang up your skates.

I think he’s just warming up and getting his legs under him for a great final period of leadership. That team needs his steadiness right now.

4. Has anyone ever actually taken that Cold fX stuff? It sure didn’t help me make a positive buying decision when my own most-loathed former NHL player was the front page spokesman! Gah!

GEE, THANKS FOR HELPING HIM STAY IN THE GAME.

October 11, 2007

get out those glad bags…

Filed under: questions, vancouver, hockey, angsty, listy, help a girl shop — meg @ 12:34 pm

… because MAN ALIVE, do you people know how to bring out the trash!

I love it. I love it so much.

And so does my faithful roommate and heterolifemate, Catherine, who phoned me from work to relive a few of the best comments. Honestly, folks — the best way to realize you’re not all that weird is to look around you and SEE THE MAGIC.

You are all magic.

And should keep being magic, if you haven’t posted your weird/trashy/awkward/problematic confessions yet below.

Here are three more of mine:

    I own a Diana, Princess of Wales paper doll kit where her base outfit is royal underwear. I have no idea where it is (I’ve moved too many times, and so have my parents…) but I find it kind of creepy at this point. Granted, I got it in 1982 (were some of you people even alive yet?), but still.

    I really, really, really enjoy the skin on KFC chicken. No, I don’t find it too salty or greasy or SKINNISH… I just love it. Mmm. And the more gross you think it is, the more left for me! Woo!

    I sing into my thumb in the car like it was a microphone. And in grocery stores. And pretty much anywhere.

Anyway. Do share. Do tell. We can’t wait to learn more.

In other news, I am buying actual shoes next week — maybe even three pairs! Which would bring my non-heel shoe total to… five pairs! — and need to think of a decent flat shoe that is not a boot or a running shoe or a walking shoe or a nurse shoe or a mom shoe.

I love ballet flats, but can’t seem to find a pair that don’t fall apart or give me the mother of all blisters on my heel. Which heals eventually (HEEL HEAL HEEL HEAL), but still.

Any suggestions?

OH! And…

If you could choose a category as yet uncategorized and unwritten at MegFowler.com, what would it be?

OH! And…

The Canucks lost by six points last night. I don’t expect anything as devastating as this to happen again, but I feel terrible for the guys. The fan bashing afterwards can’t be doing them much good in prepping for the next two games, either.

Let’s not decide we’re going to lose all season because of a couple bad contests. That’s like ending your marriage because you fight over whether to have the toilet paper roll over or under (over, by the way.) JUST MOVE ON.

And I hate “stat hexes”, too. Who cares if we lose to a team all the time? That doesn’t mean we can’t nail them now.

One more thing: Jesse Boulerice? You think you’re awesome railing on our Kes when you’re 5 points in the lead? Yeah. Meet me in the alley behind my house and I’ll give you the cross-checking of your LIFE.

OH! And…

WHAT THE FREAK! I see her going both ways. Alternately. Randomly. I keep thinking that shouldn’t work because of the lines of her body and anatomy but it HAPPENS! AAAA!!

October 9, 2007

five things NHL players and women have in common.

Filed under: hockey — meg @ 2:52 pm

1. We understand the importance of strategic padding.

2. We’re pretty relieved when any period ends.

3. We’re good at looking graceful in totally impractical shoes.

4. We’re well aware that going away requires a totally different wardrobe.

5. We definitely know the power of a good check(que).

October 7, 2007

ice princess.

Filed under: love, vancouver, hockey — meg @ 3:21 pm

Oh, do I love hockey.

I love hockey like Tammy Faye loved mascara, like Tom Cruise loves jumping on couches, like David Letterman loves a Top Ten.

If you click on my “hockey” category down there to the right, you can read some of the stuff I’ve said about it on my blog, like this and this and this.

Those posts should tell you what you need to know. But I’m going to tell you a bit more.

I love hockey because it’s beautiful and brutal all at once. Much like my love life.

You can watch people squish one another into the boards only seconds after they execute some near-balletic move to take a shot on net. That contrast of perfect and fierce is what true sport is all about to me… along with the fever pitch of competition, and the magic of camaraderie among players and in the stands.

Just a week or so ago, I got to go to an actual game, courtesy of someone very nice, and it was brilliant to scream like a freak and listen to all the people around me cheering for the same thing I was: our boys on skates!

See how happy (and tanned) we looked?

Unfortunately, my sweet Canucks were a bit shaky the night we saw them (and lost in the shootout.) They weren’t looking too confident in their season opener, either (a 3-1 loss to San Jose.)

Last night was their first win of the regular season — 5 seconds before the end of OT.

So I’m a little concerned.

Not doubting, not complaining, not bitching, mind you… no way. I’m no Bandwagon Betty, turning on the game only in the middle of a winning streak.

I’m just wanting to make sure they get off on the right skate.

And what do I think is the key?

We need bigger showings from our “marquee” players (Hello, Naslund?), more shots on net (Stop waiting for the perfect opening!), more consistent play from our defensive guys (Where ARE you?), and continued energy and drive from our “newbie” players if we’re going to stay alive in the standings this season.

We have zero time to rest on our laurels… or our Luongo.

Speaking of Luongo, I remain in love with our goalie. Even on his bad days, he shows the kind of genius we’ve needed in net for years (I was no fan of Cloutier.)

So I’ll be watching and blogging about my favourite sport all season, and seeing it live as often as possible, too. Even if I have to sell a kidney.

Stay tuned. AND GO CANUCKS GO!

August 21, 2007

and keep your stick on the ice.

Filed under: vancouver, hockey — meg @ 9:37 am

UPDATE: And justice is done. For the record? It’s embarrassing it took this long. But it’s the right thing.

***

It’s no secret that I’m a Trevor Linden fan, just as it’s no secret that my roommate plans to marry him, against all odds.

He’s a natural leader, a mental and emotional anchor for a young team, and a hardworking player who — while he may not generate marquee stats in every game, or any game — shows strength, determination and wisdom on the ice. That’s a rare set of qualities in today’s NHL. He’s old-school, he’s clutch, he’s Captain Vancouver… he’s our Trev.

But that doesn’t seem to be enough for our management right now.

Sure, we all like flashy players who rack up huge point totals, partly because they’re fun to watch, and partly because we need those points to win games. The Canucks haven’t had that kind of star power in a long time, what with the painful demise of Naslund’s enthusiasm, and the relative humility of Luongo and the Sedin twins.

Not that they don’t bring the plays that keep us afloat, but they certainly don’t showboat after every goal — or go from the locker room to the pages of tabloid rags — like 90’s sensation Pavel Bure.

That kind of bandwagon-candy glitz is why many people still say that the Canucks were at their best when Bure was lighting up the ice, but I think the best is truly yet to come with our team.

We’re in a huge development phase: our roster features a group of young players who are still discovering their areas of strength, some (fairly) skilled veterans who could use a serious boost in intensity, and a goalie who is breathtaking on his best days… and still pretty damn reliable on his worst!

If we can harness all that post-teenage energy, light a fire under the older guys, and add a strong dose of discipline and skills development to the mix, I think we’re in a position to make big things happen.

I’ve got faith, at least.

What I don’t have faith in is our Captain.

Markus Naslund was a tremendous disappointment during our playoff run this year, and a relative non-starter in many games this season.

There’s really no other way to say it; the totals weren’t there (at least according to his previous standard), and his leadership was so passive as to seem absent at times. There’s no question that he CAN be a HUGE asset to the Canucks, but we haven’t seen him achieve consistently at that level in a while. I think he could use a wake-up call.

Regardless, I’ve long been a believer in the notion that hockey captains don’t need to be the strongest scorers or the most glamourous performers on their teams.

What they do need is a powerful voice in the locker room and on the bench, a sense of honour and gravity in their play, and the ability to take a diverse group of egos and personalities and skill levels and motivate them in the same direction. If Naslund had those strengths, I’d be more willing to excuse the weak performance in other areas. But it’s simply not there to the extent the we need it now.

So who has it?

Trevor Linden. As yet unsigned.

Our management will continue to add players to fill skill holes in the team, and even inject a bit of flash and drama into the roster to keep the media buzzing. I wouldn’t expect any less; hockey is a business as well as a game, after all, with two bottom lines: stats and ticket sales.

But if they continue to treat one of the best leaders on our team like an old horse who may or may not get another lap around the track, they’re doing a huge disservice to the morale of the organization… not to mention turning a blind eye to the wishes of the fans who pay their salaries every year.

We need someone who can reign in all the inconsistencies we’ve seen on the ice for a couple of years now, and turn our rag-tag group of possibilities into a unified, passionate outfit. I don’t think I’m overestimating Linden’s character when I say that he’s the man for the job.

And I don’t think I’m overestimating the idiocy of the way he’s been dealt with when I call it a slap in the face.

We need to stop angling for the next big thing or the next quick fix, and put some dollars and time into building the mental stability of our team. That’s where we fall apart. We lack the mettle that counts when we’re behind in the third period, or facing a Game Seven. We lack the stuff that makes good players great, and the legacy-building spirit that turns teams into dynasties.

Isn’t that what we want for our Canucks?

So hurry up and sign one of Vancouver’s finest, and — even if you don’t slap a C on that new jersey, because I doubt he’d take it from Nazzy anyway — give him a chance to be our hero for another season.

We have a crucial opportunity to build on our successes and address our major flaws in a meaningful way this year, but it’s going to take someone who gets the bigger picture to take us to that next level.

And take us all the way to the Cup.

We love you, Trev, no matter what happens.

April 29, 2007

you’ve obviously felt unsatisfied for a long time.

Filed under: random, questions, hockey — meg @ 11:28 am

Wow! I had no idea there was so much stuff you wished I’d write more about!

So, since I’m lying in bed with coffee and my laptop and not getting anything ELSE done, why not babble a little now?

For Mary:

Hockey is definitely in my blood… it was inevitable that I would become a fan.

My grandfather played in the farm system of what would become today’s NHL, and my dad played in rec leagues throughout my childhood.

I was on skates pretty early on, too, and spent some time growing up in Edmonton during their “hockey dynasty” years, which accounts for the fact that I like the Canucks, not the Oilers, and Mark Messier is a mythically evil figure in my life.

It was always going on around me, really. Hockey was something to love.

But I didn’t TRULY come into my own fanship until my late teens-early twenties, when I began to fall in love with hockey players wholesale and spend all my Saturday nights watching my friends play at tiny community arenas.

Then I started to absorb stats and highlight reels with vigour… and it was all downhill from there.

Today, I am a die-hard, non-bandwagon, devoted no-matter-what Canucks fan, and will be that way until they put me in the cold, hard ground. Or the cold, hard ice, on a particularly vicious check.

For Liz:

Sports thuggery is a major pet peeve of mine, actually. As a hockey fan, I’m pretty used to guys mixing it up on the ice, but the inability to keep cool OFF the ice is really not cool. Fortunately (and I say that wryly), hockey players tend to be more of the “bar fight” variety of idiot, and not so much the “cap in your ass” types.

Many of them actually come from small towns on the prairies and Quebec where their mothers would have tossed them in the well if they’d shown up late for chores or even talked back. Lots of family influence, lots of religious influence, lots of strong role models.

Then again, hockey parents can be HORRIBLE. So it’s six of one and half a dozen of the other.

I do watch the NFL (never been a huge basketball girl), and I’m pretty disappointed by how some of the players conduct themselves.

The sad thing is that a sudden influx of money into the lives of many professional athletes creates power and conflict situations that they just aren’t prepared to deal with, and things unravel accordingly.

Background plays some role, cultural forces play some role, external relationships play some role, and team dynamics DEFINITELY play some role, but at the end of the day, there’s no excuse for abusing your privilege. I don’t care where you come from.

I believe in criminal charges, harsh suspensions, major fines, and league sanctions for athletes that take liberties on AND off the field. Period.

For Shane:

Onions make you cry because they’re nasty little bitches.

Sure, HowStuffWorks.com says this:

“When you slice through an onion, you break open a number of onion cells. Some of these cells have enzymes inside of them, and when they are sliced open, the enzymes escape. The enzymes then decompose some of the other substances that have escaped from sliced cells. Some of these substances, amino acid sulfoxides, form sulfenic acids, which then quickly rearrange themselves into a volatile gas.”

But I believe that there is just a natural human-onion conflict — like that which exists between men and women — that creates this phenomenon. And sadly, unlike the gender crisis, we don’t have sex to make it all better. So we cry.

And don’t even think about having sex with an onion. You think it hurts your eyes? Wait until they get at your bits.

For Barbie:

Yes, I do often wonder about peoples’ blog names. Sometimes, they explain the little “nicks” in their “About Me” page, and sometimes I actually just email them about it out of boundless curiosity.

Usually, however, according to the content of the blog, you can kind of figure out why they chose the name they chose. But, again… if I wonder, I ask.

I will admit that really weird, lengthy, oddball blog monikers make me roll my eyes a little, mostly because you’re not really helping anyone remember you if you make it too complicated. But that might not be what you want, anyway.

(Oh — and any blog that uses “69″ in the URL or nick is dead to me. Ha!)

Many people use their blogs as an anonymous place to vent or express things they need a special outlet for, and that’s totally cool. I love that the Web has given them that opportunity to seek out community.

I do that, too, but I don’t write about work, or express frustration that I don’t express to the source of the frustration first. That keeps me out of hot water… generally.

When people email me about starting blogs, I usually advocate for starting under their own names if they are looking to build a writing career… otherwise, it just doesn’t matter. Many people feel safer in general with a pseudonym, too, especially if they have kids.

More to come!

April 23, 2007

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

Filed under: hockey — meg @ 8:49 pm

ROUND ONE! YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

Next Page »