megfowler.com

February 11, 2008

you like voting, right?

Filed under: awards, radio radio — meg @ 3:54 pm

I love supporting my friends when they get noticed for doing the things they do. And of course, I campaign for them on here, because y’all can’t see the sign I made with crayons and posterboard.

My friend Buzz is up for a couple of accolades in the TV Week Magazine Awards — specifically, question 13 and a write-in for question 19. You do have to answer all the other questions, but it shouldn’t take you more than a minute or two. The rest of the answers don’t concern me!

This is someone who has been a faithful supporter of mine, and who lets me get on the radio and chortle at people during drive time. That takes guts. Seriously. I sound like a git.

Also? He’s got a wicked voice, serious talent, brilliant glasses, a great sense of humour, a beautiful family, and a big, bright future in front of him to complement his many years of experience in Vancouver radio and media. He’s a media peep we can be proud of in our fair city (and beyond), so please help me support him!

Thanks, guys!

February 6, 2008

whee number three!

Filed under: awards — meg @ 7:27 pm

That’s right!

I came third in both the Best Personal Blog category AND the Best Blog Post category at this year’s Canadian Blog Awards.

This means two things:

1. I am the third most personal person in Canada. Also? I post.

2. I now have TWO cartoon beavers on my blog. God bless Canada.

Thank you to everyone who voted for me. I love it!

Although the beaver thing is a little weird.

Congratulations to the winners, and may we all be more personal and posty next year!

January 30, 2008

vote-a-licious

Filed under: awards — meg @ 9:07 pm

Update: Voting has closed! Thanks for all your support and for putting up with my needy, clingy honour-student award poking.

I’m not sure when category results will be in, since they’ve oddly decided to stretch out the award giving over a week (ostensibly to give each category 15 extra minutes of fame, but I think mostly just to try and make everyone with OCD rock quietly in their chairs.)

Now back to your regularly scheduled blog!

Wanna vote for me at the Canadian Blog Awards? You’ve only got 3 more hours!

Okay! Go here:

Best Personal Blog

Best Blog Post

And want to vote for Angella, whom I love? Okay! Go here:

Best Blog Citizen (and she is!)

Best Blog Post Series

Oh yeah! And vote for Rebecca for Best Local Blog, too.

January 26, 2008

snow! friends! eggplants! awards! YES!

Hey!

It’s freakin’ snowing!

Awesome!

(Buzz, not a word about my photos going outside the lines. What are you, a kindergarten teacher?)

Or sorta, at least:

I was kinda unprepared (thank you, phone camera.)

BUT! While I was out, I saw two fun things (taken with phone camera, too):

Oranges with pet names…

And EGGPLANT PENGUINS!

That’s just weird. Nutritious, yes. But weird.

And here’s me in a shot taken by Justine’s camera phone (in Justine’s glasses) while out with my peeps last night:

Elton, or chic? You decide.

The best part of last night was Catherine and I inadvertently ending up out for dinner at a pub that was ACTIVELY celebrating Robbie Burns Day. We laughed so hard, we could barely eat. It was AWESOME.

Singing! Dancing! Shouting!

YEAH!

WOO!

HEY!

Wanna vote for me at the Canadian Blog Awards?

Okay! Go here:

Best Personal Blog

Best Blog Post

And want to vote for Angella, whom I love? Okay! Go here:

Best Blog Citizen (and she is!)

Best Blog Post Series

Oh yeah! And you should vote for Rebecca for Best Local Blog, too.

Whew!

January 23, 2008

at least my name isn’t “mitt”

Filed under: awards — meg @ 7:40 am

Hey everyone!

I’m a finalist in two categories for this year’s Canadian Blog Awards. Last year, I won the Best New Blog award, and came third in Best Personal Blog.

This year, you can vote for me in two categories (if you like, that is):

Best Personal Blog

Best Blog Post (reprinted in the previous entry)

Feel free to send this to your Grandma so she can vote, too! I’m up against some very tough competition (and when I say very tough, I mean that I am a junebug to their Mothra) so I’d love your support.

Thanks!!

January 22, 2008

it’s like tasting it again for the very first time.

Filed under: awards — meg @ 11:38 pm

Round Two begins tomorrow. I’m a finalist for Best Personal Blog and Best Blog Post, which is reprinted below:

LOOK AT MY BOOBS! I AM VERY SMART!

A month or so ago, Catherine and I were driving along in her car when a song came on the radio that gave us both pause. Not because it was extraordinarily awesome, and not because it was extraordinarily bad, but because it was just so… typical.

So typical that it stood out.

See, I’ve long been of the opinion that girls today are being screwed over by popular music just like the girls in my generation were… except MUCH, MUCH MORE SO.

The lyrics aren’t getting any worse per se, and the women aren’t any more tarty than they once were (though you could argue that, at which point I’d offer you the full Samantha Fox discography, plus a reel of Tawny Kitaen rolling across the hood of a car in a Whitesnake video) but now the messages are being couched in self-empowerment.

We’ve been Madonna-ized.

But.

The song in question:

There’s more to me than meets the eye
so come and look inside
Go deep…
‘Cause beauty’s more than skin deep

Okay, try and ignore for a second there that they rhymed “deep” with “deep”, and that there are two full cliches in the space of four lines.

When you read those lines, you think, “Well, that’s good! There is more to me than meets the eye! And beauty is more than skin deep! Yeah! Boys! Check me out — I have substance, even if I don’t own a thesaurus!”

Then you get a little more understanding of the kind of girl we’re talking here:

Don’t need to know the kind of guy
who’s quick to drop the fly
Wham bam!
That ain’t who I am…

Ah! So you’re not planning to date within the NBA? Good for you.

Then it kinda falls apart.

Don’t a-let my booty beauty
be the only reason you wanna ride
Don’t a-let my hottie body
jack the fact that I got a lot more in mind

It sounds good — I mean, you want people to look past your hotness to your internal awesomeness, right?

But was anyone really paying attention after you said “booty beauty”?

This is the dilemma of late teens/early twenties/(oh, who am I kidding) early thirties women today.

We’ve turned into nudists screaming at people not to stare at our bits.

“I am proud of my body! I love my body! Look at my sexual empowerment! Do you see my ass? It rocks! HEY! STOP LOOKING AT MY ASS! BEAUTY IS MORE THAN SKIN DEEP! BUT I DON’T BLAME YOU, THESE JEANS MAKE MY ASS LOOK AWESOME!”

It’s a little confusing.

Then we get to the chorus:

If it’s just the physical
It would be sensational
But if you really got into me
You know you’d be insatiable

I get the whole point: I’m pretty freakin’ hot and you’d be lucky to have me but DID YOU KNOW I ALSO CAN DISCUSS CAMUS AND HAVE A CERTIFICATE IN THAI COOKERY?

Why do we always need to make such a point of our sexual identity in the first place, though? Why do we have to be so bluntly, obviously, blatantly hot as hell and THEN, once we are SUPER SEXY WHOA, be something else, too?

You’d never hear the song in reverse:

If we were intellectual
It would be sensational
But if I took off my grandpa sweater
Then you’d be insatiable!

I suppose it comes down to this:

The culture we’ve developed for young women has made blunt-force sexuality synonymous with empowerment, and THEN asked those same girls with the visible thong and two-foot cleavage to make sure that men notice their hearts, too.

How about we don’t dress them up like Paris Hilton, and then ask them to tuck a copy of the Iliad in their hobo bag?

How about we keep Joe Francis away from institutions of higher education?

How about we tell them to ignore any man who needs reminding that they have a brain?

Don’t get me wrong — I LOVE a good wallop of chemistry to get things going, and there’s nothing wrong with enjoying that chemistry for a while before you go anywhere else. Girls can like that physical spark as much (or more) than guys. And perhaps I own one or two shirts that don’t come all the way to, say, my chin (ONLY THE ONE, DAD.)

But I’m tired of watching young girls try and be everything at once, and only succeeding at communicating one aspect of who they are because we’ve taught them nothing about subtlety or true self-respect (or how to put on clothing that covers their drafty parts).

Maybe I’m just getting old.

Or distracted by my own hotness.

It’s hard to say.

LOOK AT MY NAVEL! I KNOW DEAD LANGUAGES!

***

Voting links up tomorrow!

not the best, but potentially overly personal? also… boobs.

Filed under: awards — meg @ 8:50 am

Well, there you go.

I was eliminated from the Best Blog category (fair enough, fair enough… I’d be hard pressed to say I really had the Best Blog in Canada), and remain in the “Best Personal Blog” and “Best Blog Post” categories.

This is fun, but since I’m up against Raymi (who has one of the largest readerships in Canada) and Schmutzie (same, I think… and we share some readers, too…), I don’t think I stand much of a chance. And we’ll see if “boobs” saves me on the other. Ahem.

The next round of voting starts tomorrow.

(Oh, and no criticism of other nominees in my comments. Anything like that will be deleted. I love your support, but I also love the different voices in the community, too.)

January 21, 2008

you’ve only got 16 more hours to do it…

Filed under: awards — meg @ 8:44 am

So you better get to it!

January 14, 2008

and you don’t even need to be from canada to vote…

Filed under: love, awards — meg @ 8:44 am

Canadian Blog Awards.

I’m, um, up for a few. Best Blog, Best Personal Blog, and Best Blog Post.

And be sure to vote for my radio pal and Scrabble foe Buzz Bishop while you’re at it for Best New Blog (which I won last year) and Best Media/Celebrity Blog!

Also, local maven Miss604 is also up for Best Local Blog. Awesome!

Best Personal Blog
Best Blog Post
Best Blog
Best New Blog
Best Media/Celebrity Blog
Best Local Blog

Thanks, if you do. :) And feel free to share this post with anyone you like. :)

Note: Unlike last year, you can only vote once per round, instead of once daily.

April 23, 2007

thinky mcthinkersons.

Filed under: think, awards — meg @ 9:00 am

Wow! Look what I got from the lovely and brilliant Monty and the equally awesome Barbie! It’s the Thinking Blogger Award!

You guys are the best. And yes, I know I am formatting this all wrong, but it’s early and Game Seven is tonight, so I’m a bit of a flake. Which, now that I think of it, is nothing new…

First off, Barbie: Thank you so much for writing so honestly about your life and sharing all your joys and struggles and opinions and loves (and pictures of Moo.) I love how much we have in common (ugh, the health issues!), and most of all, that we share a common disease that NO one really recovers from: HOCKEY! Woo! You’re a great girl.

Monty: You probably make me think more than ANY other blogger I know, mostly because you are a beautiful and true writer and a deep (and gritty and real) ponderer, and partly because we have the best (and sometimes most fiery!) conversations via email. You are a kickass parent and a wickedly funny woman. You have also been there for me whenever I needed it, and that has been a blessing. I love what you do, and you do it brilliantly — so keep doing it! And I love that we can disagree and still find acres of common ground in the end.

It’s my job at this point, from what I understand, to nominate five more people for this award. Which is easy to do. Because I know a lot of thinky people.

Now, since I can’t nominate these women again, and since I only get five…

1. I love how Wood and Dutch write over at Sweet Juniper. They’ve made me laugh until I was crying, and then… well… cry because I was crying. Dutch’s parodies are brilliant beyond brilliant, their playlists have pointed me in the direction of some excellent tunes, and their site and product recommendations are always spot on. But I love to read MOST about their relationship and way they navigate the tricky waters of parenting. And their little girl, Juniper? Gorgeous.

2. Dick is one of my old buddies from the Salon days. His blog covers everything from the personal to the political to the poetic, and flows so beautifully that you never notice the stitches joining his thoughts. He’s also a musician, and heaven knows I cannot help crushing on “band boys.” His kids are also unbelievably sweet.

3. Liz is one of my most forever-y readers, and the kind of writer I aspire to be someday. She just has a way of saying things that is so absolutely and totally RIGHT. I love hearing about what she’s thinking, what’s she’s feeling, what she’s up to, and what she’s passionate about. Plus, she’s in Sweden, which makes everything more fun, especially town names and food names. I also love her amazing photos. Well done, girl.

4. I really should NOT give Eric this award. Not because he doesn’t make me think, and not because he’s not a fabulous writer and an amazing friend. No, he just SUCKS at updating his blog. Mind you, he used to be really good at it, and we’d all spend tons of time there trying to follow the quirky trajectory of his thoughts. But now? Now he wears Waldo shirts and claims to be too busy lighting stuff to write. Go there anyway, and read his archives. I’m sure he’ll get off his ass soon.

5. It wouldn’t be right not to nominate my original blog fairy godfather, Chuck. He is a terrifically gifted writer who thinks deeply and then pours that depth onto the page without being maudlin or saccharine. He also encourages me in my own work more than almost anyone I know (and that’s hard to do… I know pretty encouraging people!) I love that he’s always coming up with weird projects for us to write together — projects we never actually end up doing. But they always sound fun.

Honestly, I could give you twenty more. But a good way to figure out who makes me think is to click “Sweet Reads” up there and see what you find.

Big love to Monty and Barbie! I’m honoured.