
UPDATE: And justice is done. For the record? It’s embarrassing it took this long. But it’s the right thing.
***
It’s no secret that I’m a Trevor Linden fan, just as it’s no secret that my roommate plans to marry him, against all odds.
He’s a natural leader, a mental and emotional anchor for a young team, and a hardworking player who — while he may not generate marquee stats in every game, or any game — shows strength, determination and wisdom on the ice. That’s a rare set of qualities in today’s NHL. He’s old-school, he’s clutch, he’s Captain Vancouver… he’s our Trev.
But that doesn’t seem to be enough for our management right now.
Sure, we all like flashy players who rack up huge point totals, partly because they’re fun to watch, and partly because we need those points to win games. The Canucks haven’t had that kind of star power in a long time, what with the painful demise of Naslund’s enthusiasm, and the relative humility of Luongo and the Sedin twins.
Not that they don’t bring the plays that keep us afloat, but they certainly don’t showboat after every goal — or go from the locker room to the pages of tabloid rags — like 90′s sensation Pavel Bure.
That kind of bandwagon-candy glitz is why many people still say that the Canucks were at their best when Bure was lighting up the ice, but I think the best is truly yet to come with our team.
We’re in a huge development phase: our roster features a group of young players who are still discovering their areas of strength, some (fairly) skilled veterans who could use a serious boost in intensity, and a goalie who is breathtaking on his best days… and still pretty damn reliable on his worst!
If we can harness all that post-teenage energy, light a fire under the older guys, and add a strong dose of discipline and skills development to the mix, I think we’re in a position to make big things happen.
I’ve got faith, at least.
What I don’t have faith in is our Captain.
Markus Naslund was a tremendous disappointment during our playoff run this year, and a relative non-starter in many games this season.
There’s really no other way to say it; the totals weren’t there (at least according to his previous standard), and his leadership was so passive as to seem absent at times. There’s no question that he CAN be a HUGE asset to the Canucks, but we haven’t seen him achieve consistently at that level in a while. I think he could use a wake-up call.
Regardless, I’ve long been a believer in the notion that hockey captains don’t need to be the strongest scorers or the most glamourous performers on their teams.
What they do need is a powerful voice in the locker room and on the bench, a sense of honour and gravity in their play, and the ability to take a diverse group of egos and personalities and skill levels and motivate them in the same direction. If Naslund had those strengths, I’d be more willing to excuse the weak performance in other areas. But it’s simply not there to the extent the we need it now.
So who has it?
Trevor Linden. As yet unsigned.
Our management will continue to add players to fill skill holes in the team, and even inject a bit of flash and drama into the roster to keep the media buzzing. I wouldn’t expect any less; hockey is a business as well as a game, after all, with two bottom lines: stats and ticket sales.
But if they continue to treat one of the best leaders on our team like an old horse who may or may not get another lap around the track, they’re doing a huge disservice to the morale of the organization… not to mention turning a blind eye to the wishes of the fans who pay their salaries every year.
We need someone who can reign in all the inconsistencies we’ve seen on the ice for a couple of years now, and turn our rag-tag group of possibilities into a unified, passionate outfit. I don’t think I’m overestimating Linden’s character when I say that he’s the man for the job.
And I don’t think I’m overestimating the idiocy of the way he’s been dealt with when I call it a slap in the face.
We need to stop angling for the next big thing or the next quick fix, and put some dollars and time into building the mental stability of our team. That’s where we fall apart. We lack the mettle that counts when we’re behind in the third period, or facing a Game Seven. We lack the stuff that makes good players great, and the legacy-building spirit that turns teams into dynasties.
Isn’t that what we want for our Canucks?
So hurry up and sign one of Vancouver’s finest, and — even if you don’t slap a C on that new jersey, because I doubt he’d take it from Nazzy anyway — give him a chance to be our hero for another season.
We have a crucial opportunity to build on our successes and address our major flaws in a meaningful way this year, but it’s going to take someone who gets the bigger picture to take us to that next level.
And take us all the way to the Cup.
We love you, Trev, no matter what happens.
That is one hot picture of Catherine’s future husband. Holy crap!
I am a fellow Canucks Lover and I have to agree with the fact that Nazzy is done. He was done a couple years ago. The thing is, I disagree that Trevor is the best man for the job. I think he’s a better choice than Naslund right now, but the sad thing is that he’s the best choice in a bad situation, rather than the best man for the job. I think our team is desperately lacking for leadership. They are all playing willy-nilly without a sense of purpose. They need someone to show them how to play as a cohesive unit, rather than each guy doing the best he can for his himself. They need to learn to do the best they can for the team, as a team. I think Trevor could certainly help them out for a bit in that capacity, but we need a long term solution for a Captain. One that comes back every year and grows in strength with the team. I don’t think we have anyone like that right now…………please still like me!
OMG! I can’t WAIT until hockey starts…..
Of course I still like you!
I’m sticking by my point, though: I think Linden has the gravity and history that will get him taken seriously right now. I do doubt that they’ll ever put the C on him, or that he would even take it from Naslund… that’s just how he is.
You’re very right that we need a captain who can take us through the next few years, and I don’t think Linden is going to be there long term, signed this year or otherwise.
But right now? And with the sheer quality of his leadership? He will be the de facto captain we need.
I agree wholeheartedly with you Meg and I think it’s appalling that the Canucks are more interested in unveiling their new ‘away’ sweaters than signing the one player who has, and hopefully will again, lead the team through the playoffs.
I’m not a Canucks fan by any stretch, but us Oilers fans have been feeling the same pain for the last season (at least since Chris Pronger said Edmonton sucks). We’re in much the same situation, except that at least we’ve been able to sign some big-ish names since July 1 (Sheldon Souray and Dustin Penner). Not so sure who our captain is going to be…but hey, if the Canucks don’t sign Linden, we’d take him.
Thank you, Meg! I agree completely! You said exactly what I’ve been thinking so much better than I could have.
Great timing on the post, btw! I just got an email from the Canucks saying that Trev has been re-signed. :)
yay!!! welcome back, Trev! you are a gentleman and a perfect role model for the sport of hockey! and you are pretty damn cute too!
I agree with Shannon that my future husband looks gorgeous.
You should have sent this to the Province or the Vancouver Sun. You expressed yourself a hell of a lot more eloquently than the writers whose pieces usually appear in the Sports section!
It’s the best game you can name!
That’s a GOOD picture of the man!