megfowler.com

February 7, 2007

bodies, rest and motion.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 11:30 am

In my last post, when I asked about the “stupid things we think about too often”, I wasn’t shocked to hear women mention difficult thoughts about their bodies as a constant challenge in their lives.

Of course.

This is our obsession.

The workout frenzy girls; the diet girls; the “accept me however I am!” girls; the bodyshaping underwear girls; the sports nut girls; the buy-jeans-one-size-too-small girls; the recovering-from-an-eating-disorder-girls; the girls for whom the most scathing and oft-used insult is, “She’s fat!”; the sex-with-the-lights-off girls; the “I lost weight and now I barely wear clothes!” girls; the “I just want to feel healthy” girls; the girls who constantly reference Nicole Ritchie; the girls who count calories; the girls who have an ideal they can’t let go of; the girls who raise an eyebrow at teenage girls and say, “yeah, you better wear that while you can!”; the before-and-after picture girls; the professionally self-deprecating girls; the girls with the medical concerns who can’t get where they want; the girls who date guys who confirm their self-hatred; the girls who won’t believe men love them regardless of imperfections; the girls who never gained a pound until they gained a pound and then lost all their anchoring in the world; the girls who resent that they care; the girls who judge people who don’t care; and the girls who don’t care except sometimes when they catch the wrong angle in a mirror walking by.

There are girls, of course, who don’t give a rat’s ass how they look, or like/love how they look. Which is great.

But they are awfully rare. For a reason.

We live in a society that is obsessed with appearance. We live in a society where billions and billions of dollars are spent every year in the pursuit of a certain type of appearance, a certain way of being. We can tell you the calorie counts on everything.

We watch our public figures’ bodies like hawks.

We compare ourselves to actresses and our girlfriends.

We remember every good and bad thing ever said about how we look.

We’ve actually said the words, “Well, the flu sucked, but I lost ten pounds!”

We get older, we experience health changes, we have babies, we embark on programs, we gain weight, we go up and down on the scale, we fear high school reunions, we want to get back at exes, we poke at parts of ourselves, we wear things that are “forgiving.”

This is us.

Practically speaking, being within the correct medical weight range for your height is a good thing, according to most doctors. But it doesn’t mean you’re healthy. Being healthy means you’re healthy — it’s just one of the factors. There are plenty of skinny girls who aren’t doing as well on the inside as heavier girls.

Then there are the arguments for being genetically pre-programmed to seek out the healthiest mate possible, there are the arguments about culture and nature and nurture and diet and location, there are the lengthy discussions of feminism and chauvanism and lookism and ageism and… well, everything else.

So much stuff. At length. All the time. Ongoing. Everywhere.

I get so sick of it, I can’t even tell you. What can I tell you?

I’m overweight. I have not been my whole life — just the opposite, actually — but I am now. Genetics? Autoimmune disorder? Hormonal imbalances? Laziness? Yep.

No two ways about it, no overstatement, no “but I’m so proud!”, no dysmorphia. It needs to change, but it is what it is.

And I hate writing about it. What the hell does how my body looks have to do with me as a writer or as a woman or as a human being? I don’t talk about relationships I’ve had or sex or anything else like that here, because my audience is so varied and wide.

Why do I need to be yet another female blogger obsessing about how she looks or going on about my diet at length? Why do I need to go there in this venue when my figure does not define my intelligence, my sense of humour, my wisdom about life, my capacity to love?

Because.

It just keeps coming up. It will not go away.

So much of our identity as women — and men, for that matter — is tied into how we look that I’m kidding myself to think it won’t come up here at all.

Say I want to post a picture of myself on my blog, but I hate how my body looks in the photo, so there, I’ll put my face up. That is my face, after all… that’s how I look. That’s good enough for people to connect with, to get a sense of me, right? My body doesn’t define me! This isn’t an online dating profile! I’m a writer! Why should I even GO there on my website? If I wouldn’t bring it up in conversation with a friend, why should I discuss it on my blog?

But then some part of me worries that this is dishonest. That I’m hiding something under the guise of not wanting to make a point of it. I get emails from people wanting to hang out with me and I think, ugh, they’d be disappointed if they met me. I’m not very pretty.

I’ve dealt for years with people’s frustrations with how I look.

Such a pretty girl, if only she’d lose weight.

Such a smart girl, why doesn’t she lose weight?

You can’t choose what you’re attracted to, sorry.

I would love you if you were thinner.

I’m surprised how confident you are on stage, given… well, how you look.

You dress so well for your… body type.

You should be less argumentative/less opinionated/less somethingorother… you need as much going for you as you can get.

Once, a boy offered to pay me to go on a diet. Once, a boy told me he thought we would be married by now if I looked different. Once, a boy who thought he might like me changed his mind as soon as he met me. Once a boy said how I looked made him sad.

All of these things hurt terribly. All of these things stay in my head.

But I’ll be damned if I ever wanted sympathy or community in it. Going there in a public sense felt — feels — self-indulgent, felt like looking for reassurance, felt like drama. And screw all of that, as it were.

Who am I kidding, though? Every compliment I get on this blog about my appearance, I think, “Oh, if you knew.”

Never mind that some of those come from people who DO know. I’ve let myself get neurotic about this, and it has to come to a stop.

I try not to be neurotic about it in my daily life, actually. And it’s worked.

Most of my girlfriends are thinner than me, but almost all of them will confide to me about their insecurities, their diets, their issues without much of a second thought.

One of them even phoned me crying when she grew out of her size four jeans. I don’t think it even occurred to her who she was talking to, or how ironic it was.

And that’s how I like it. I don’t want little weird boundaries about what people can say around me.

That’s how little I bring it up in my speech, in my work, in anything.

Not because I don’t know it. Not because I don’t deal with it. Not because I don’t want to change it, because YES, I do. I just deal with it in a private way.

And I know this post this has been all over the place, but that reflects my feelings on the whole issue pretty perfectly.

So.

I need to work on my body.

I will work on my body, and I have been, though I probably won’t talk about it here. It doesn’t make me happy. It’s not what I enjoy writing about. The diet blog will not be forthcoming.

None of this has anything to do with my skill as a writer, my value as a friend, my capacity for thought, for love, for humour. And if you think it does, I’m sad for you.

It does have lot to do with how I walk into relationships. But that is not the fault of men in general, but some specific men. And I need to let that go. And I am, and this is part of it.

Girls out there? I feel you in how much it hurts, how much it consumes your thoughts. If you ever need support, to vent, to be complimented wildly? I have your back.

I support you in doing healthy things you need to do to feel better, but I don’t support you in mocking yourself or mocking others for their appearance. Don’t you dare sell out other women and think it’s funny. That’s absolute bullshit. There is no excuse.

This is me, then.

And that is really all I have to say about that.

February 6, 2007

tell. me. now.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 11:18 am

I ask a lot of questions.

This is something my friends have had to get used to.

And I don’t mean, “How does this blender work?” or “Why are you wearing those pants?” or “How are you?” or “Is it raining where you are?”

No, questions like, “If you could choose to change one thing in your life right now, what would it be?” or “What aspect of your personality has caused you the most crisis over the years?”

Yeah, okay, maybe it’s a little annoying. But if you’d done three damn years of 250 interviews a year trying to squeeze reasonable facts out of teenagers who must be dragged kicking and screaming into abstract thought, you’d become a weird conversationalist, too.

I was planning to be a lawyer or a journalist for a good portion of my life. And if you look at the shared aspects of those careers, it all comes down to WANTING TO KNOW. The facts, the angles, the experiences, the realities, the opinions. All of it.

I’m accustomed to digging.

I can make small talk, but I get bored with it SO quickly. I don’t really care about errands people have to run or the traffic or what they want for lunch or who didn’t phone them back, and certainly not as the be-all, end-all of conversational exchanges. Is that ironic for a blogger? Maybe. But I never said I wasn’t horribly ironic.

And come to think of it, no one’s really gotten irritated at me about my queer querying. Catherine calls my little investigations “Meg Questions” and will get me to ask her some if we’re bored in a lineup or waiting for our meals in a restaurant. She’s often a little taken aback by the things I’ll ask perfect strangers, but that’s part of my charm, right?

Finally, y’all seem to like it when I post them here.

Really, the only figures in my life that seem a bit bewildered by it are men I’m interested in, and it’s safe to say that you’re probably not meant to be with me anyhow if you can’t wrap your brain around, “What are you really excited to do with the next year of your life?” I’m not asking for a novel. I’m not even asking you to know the answer — you can say you don’t know. But if you never consider stuff like that, and outright refuse to?

Yeah. Not gonna work out.

And I don’t care if that’s difficult. Relationships involve compromise to the nth degree, but there’s little use in compromising the heart of who you are because someone else thinks it’s silly. Inevitably, though, I WILL have to end up with a guy who can figure out how to shut me up without shutting me down. Because I do ask too much on occasion… and I’m also really good at silence when I’m pissed off.

That’s the short version of why I ask so many questions here. This is why I care what you think. Because you make me think. You have no idea how novel some of your thoughts are! How much wisdom you have! How cool you are! How little I’ve considered certain points of view! How dense I can be! How much I’m wrestling with things and force you to help me with it!

I do wish being curious made me smarter. But alas. It just makes me hungry. Like I am right now. For Thai food, inexplicably.

Anyhow.

TODAY’S FUN THINGS MEG WANTS TO KNOW:

    If you could straight-up, successfully change one element of your life this year, what would it be?

    What kind of knowledge are you most hungry for in life?

    What really stupid thing do you think about too often?

    What one thing do you really respect in others?

    Would you call yourself a patient person? What makes you impatient?

    What one thing do you wish others respected in you?

    Do you trust other people to keep your secrets/honour their promises/do the right thing when it comes to you?

    Do you think people who are doing/saying stupid things need to be told and made fun of, or is it none of your business?

TA DA!

I am stoked to read your answers. But I promise not to say “stoked” again.

February 5, 2007

oh, I’ll ring your bell, alright.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 7:17 pm

Tonight on the bus on the way home, there were approximately five million old ladies with ten million large pull-carts full of bags and secrets and other things the aged need as they traverse the earth.

I stood, of course, because that’s what you’re supposed to do with a million old ladies about. But the bus driver made it tough to keep standing.

BRAKE!

HIT THE GAS!

BRAKE!

HIT THE GAS!

SWERVE!

The old ladies would cluck their tongues as we whirled like dervishes and swung from the overhead straps, wondering why we didn’t stand more still, show more discipline, more resolve.

Finally, my stop came, and I made the long leap to ring the bell, right over the head of one of the carted ladies.

She smacked my hand.

HARD.

I was so startled, I missed my stop.

Her expression was markedly indignant, as though I’d violated her personal space on such a grand level that I should be condemned to that level of hell reserved for wild and presumptuous young women.

“I was just reaching for the bell.”

“Were you, then.”

“I was!”

“Fine, go again.”

I don’t know what she thought I was up to, but she let me reach once more, extending my flipper-short arm across the old lady abyss to secure my release.

And then I thanked her.

Because my mother raised me right.

You might think old ladies are vulnerable, helpless, weak.

In need of protection.

And yes, perhaps there are physical limitations. They can’t do the high jump or run the 5-minute mile or do the mambo for hours at a time.

But those girls can SMACK.

And I walked an extra 500 m to prove it.

Represent.

aches, pains, and sorry refrains.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 9:31 am

Gah, that was horrid yesterday.

And after such an auspicious beginning.

I’m not even talking about the game, either… that I can’t do quite yet. It’s too sad.

No, I’m talking about my gyoza, which turned out really, really… moist. And icky.

Brunch was amazing, my guac and salsa were brilliant, and even my edamame sang with soyish delight. But then my wee little dumplings went very wrong, very quickly. It’s always a bit of a let down when you have a brilliant food day, and then end the whole shebang off with something that tastes vaguely of socks.

I probably won’t make those again. Ah, well.

It was a day for big beginnings and awkward endings, and I’m all for making my life one giant repeating metaphor. Huzzah!

One other thing that repeated throughout the day was a terrible ache in my left arm, right up near the bicep. Oh, the pain! Oh the throbbing!

I have no idea what’s wrong with it — and yes, it still hurts today — other than a random bruise I secured Wednesdayish of last week. But why would a bruise suddenly create whole-arm pain, days and days later? That makes no sense. I ended up having to stand and hang from the overhead strap on the commuter bus this morning, which was pretty much the definition of discomfort (experimental theatre notwithstanding.)

I tried to hold on with my right arm, but this man next to me kept nestling up underneath it — HEY! — so I was forced to use my left limb and wince in pain the entire time. The nestling man looked at me with ardent concern, so much so that I nearly turned to him and said, “THIS! IS! BECAUSE! YOU! HAVE! NO! PERSONAL! SPACE!”

Then I decided that bellowing on transit would have provided readily-documented evidence of my ongoing mental decline, and instead said a silent prayer of thanks that the elderly man on my left was not attempting to spoon.

I think I would have thought less about the pain in my arm if my iPod were working.

I don’t think it’s broken, but the battery died yesterday in a weird fit of jangly, slow-motion music. It had been half-charged, but all that power disappeared in a blink when I tried to start it up again this morning. I don’t know what’s going on, really, other than the heartbreaking possibility that my (obsolete) silver Mini may be gearing up to head to the big Apple in the sky. He already tried to give up the ghost last month, after all, but made the crucial mistake of not filling out a gadget DNR form.

I think it must mean something that he always dies when he’s playing an exceedingly crap song. Are you trying to tell me something about my taste, Quinn? (That’s his name, of course. I like to name my Apple products with vaguely scholarly and effete names, as though they were sensitive, easily-damaged souls with dry senses of humour, dogeared copies of Joyce Carol Oates novels, and striped mufflers.)

And speaking of exceedingly crap, Vancouver’s back on MoistAlert. I left my home today and was immediately greeted with a thin layer of dew on every square inch of my body. I had no idea I had such powerful humectant qualities, although I do often spill random liquids on myself.

Why so damp, I say? It’s not even actually raining, but rather misting, as though we were living in the produce section between the radicchio and the asparagus. Some honest, straightforward precipitation is never truly amiss, as long as it only lasts a day and gives way to sun! sun! sun! But I have a feeling that this odd foggy haze is going to last, which ensures that my hairstyle most definitely will not.

Really, I’m a mess. And my coffee is lukewarm. And my arm still hurts. Woe is me!

I need to steal away to a cabin in Aspen where the snow collects on the sills and I can wear bright and happy sweaters and brace against the outside chill by bracing against, say, Tom Brady.

I don’t know why he’d be in my cabin, but I certainly wouldn’t toss him out into the cold, would I?

February 4, 2007

i ain’t mad atcha.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 7:21 pm

Oh, well.

Next year?

Go Pats? Hawks? Bears?

Update: Congrats to Colts fans and Tony! I should have said that before!

Just because I don’t love Peyton doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate what that win meant to many of you. You go, kids.

alas and alack.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 5:22 pm

Well, Indy is leading at the half. I’m still optimistic. But WHOA to the Prince.

That man IS the party.

February 3, 2007

super bowl, meg version 2.0.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 5:21 pm

Tomorrow is the Super Bowl.

I’m sure you already knew this, and if you didn’t know it, you likely don’t care.

In fact, you might even be the kind of person who a) hates sports; b) hates televised sports; c) hates football; or d) has alternate plans involving mountain hikes and breathing deeply and being thankful for the earth and other healthful and socially-redeeming acts instead (namaste?)

Either that, or you hate the Colts and the Bears.

And I’m right there with 50% of you.

GO BEARS!

I used to go to Super Bowl parties in various locations with various people, but a lot of those soirees fell apart when my group of friends married off in pairs and began having babies.

Babies who are less than enthused with people jumping around and shouting and spilling salsa on them as they crawl by. Which sounds fun to me, but whatever, you know? Babies are weird.

The only other party I used to go to involved a rag-tag crop of my single male friends (and I love them dearly, don’t get me wrong… as do their now-wives) who delighted in nothing more than mocking my knowledge of football in general, and that game in particular.

At length. After every play.

Basically, if I had anything less than a near-savant grasp of every detail, I was abused for hours on end.

That, AND they had no knowledge of how to actually run a party, with amazing snacks and lots of joy in the ads and the Halftime show. They would disappear after the second quarter to buy cheap, nasty pizza, and then come back in time for the third to mock me again.

Good times, good times.

So I stay home.

I mean, I guess could go out to an establishment around here and watch it there, but eh… I can make better food than that at home, and any really attractive men I might meet by accident are usually there with scowling, non-football-loving girlfriends named Melody who drink wine coolers.

I can make my own fun.

And my fun involves five things:

Wearing yoga pants
Sitting on the couch
Watching the game
Eating
Screaming

Sounds good, mmm?

Granted, the food I make and the things I tend to scream at the TV might seem a little odd to the external viewer, but all of it makes me happy, and that’s what counts.

My menu:

Pre-game show:

Eggs with aged cheddar
Maple bacon
Multigrain toast
Kicking Horse “Three Sisters” coffee
Fresh orange juice

Beginning of game:

Homemade salsa fresca
Homemade guacamole
Baked tortilla chips, blue and yellow corn

Second half of game:

Edamame with coarse salt (Salt that I bought for a MILLION DOLLARS at Whole Foods. Why is salt so expensive? IT’S SALT, DAMMIT. IT’S FAIRLY COMMON. WHY AM I SO ADDICTED TO WHOLE FOODS? I AM A SUCKER. WHY AM I YELLING?)
Gyoza with lemon-soy dip

Doesn’t that sound yummy? Yes, it does.

And I’ll try not to choke on and/or throw any of my fun eats at the television when I get worked up about the game. Because I will. Did I mention that?

No one makes more noise than I do while watching sports.

Basically, it’ll be me, my couch of awesomeness, a full belly (hence the yoga pants), and an impending case of laryngitis.

Game on!

February 2, 2007

addict.

Filed under: stuff — meg @ 9:53 am

Do you ever look at the stuff you own and go, “Holy crap, I spend a lot of money on that!”

I don’t mean food. (unless it’s going out to eat)

I don’t mean your family. (unless you purchase different members on a whim to pad out your gatherings)

I don’t mean rent.

I don’t mean gas.

None of the basics.

What things in your life that AREN’T essentials do you tend to spend a whack of cash on? I mean, YOU might see them as essentials, but if you can live a reasonably functional life without them… well, they ain’t essentials.

Gadgets? Music? Collections? Hobbies? Products? Events? Books? Movies? Going out?

Evidently I have a problem with lip gloss. I accrue it like mad and lug it all around in my purse, but often forget to put it on.

I’m not one of those people who looks like they shellacked their face, but I do like the hint of colour when I remember it.

And there’s nothing wrong with lip gloss, per se. I JUST CAN’T STOP BUYING IT.

So.

What are you frittering your money away on?

« Previous Page